Author Archive

Meet Christian Britschgi of Arizona Watchdog

Monday, March 27th, 2017

Christian Britschgi

Christian Britschgi is Watchdog’s latest addition, writing for our newly launched Arizona Watchdog bureau. He began his journalism career in college, writing for the College Fix and The Lens. After graduating from Portland State University, he interned at Reason Magazine’s D.C. Office, where he wrote extensively on everything from public transit to pop culture.

As a reporter for Arizona Watchdog, Christian will report on a wide variety of issues, including cronyism, school choice, regulations and occupational licensing. Get to know him in the interview below:

1. Where are you from? Tell us about yourself and how you found yourself in Arizona.

I’m from a military family, so I guess you could say I’m not really from anywhere.  Because of my dad’s job with the Air Force I moved around a lot as a kid, living in places are far apart as Alabama and Australia. I ended up in Arizona thanks to hiring me to be a reporter down here.

2. What do you do when you aren’t being a journalist?

When not being a journalist, I enjoy reading history, listening to heavy metal, and jogging.

3. Why did you choose a career in journalism?

I started freelancing articles for the College Fix while still in school, but for the longest time never seriously considered working as a journalist.  That changed when I got accepted for a journalism internship with Reason Magazine.  Having the opportunity to write about government abuses and the movement for liberty around the country really opened my mind to a possible career in journalism, and by the end of my internship that was all I really wanted to do with my life.

4. What is your favorite part of working in journalism?

My favorite part of the news business is the detective-like aspect of it all.  Every story starts as a sort of mystery, and it’s my job to uncover the facts, talk to the right people, and then connect all the dots in a way that is both interesting and informative.  It requires a lot of enterprise and hustle, and there is honestly never a dull moment.

5. What does watchdog journalism mean to you? What sets​ apart?

Watchdog journalism represents a real opportunity to hold those in power accountable and inform the public of how their lives are shaped by forces they might not even be aware of.  Few outlets cast a more skeptical or penetrating eye on how our state and local governments operate, and I’m honored to be part of that effort.

You can follow Arizona Watchdog on Facebook and Twitter

A look back at Sunshine Week

Monday, March 13th, 2017

July 4, 1776 was the day America declared its independence, but December 15, 1791 was the day we declared our freedom.

It was on that day that the 13 former British colonies ratified the Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment. Our right to speak out about the government was enshrined in law. Freedom of the press, long denied by government, was guaranteed.

While the First Amendment gave citizens powerful tools to hold their government accountable, there was more work to do. In the 1960s, the federal Freedom of Information Act, and similar state laws that followed, made it clear that government has an obligation to be open and transparent. But the framers of the Bill of Rights were the trendsetters, and their message was clear:

We the People are in charge.

Letting in the sunshine

Sunshine Week — March 12-18, 2017 — was hosted by the American Society of News Editors and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, two organizations that play a crucial rule in advocating for press freedom and government transparency.

The first ever Sunshine Week was in 2005, and it was established to coincide with James Madison’s birthday and National Freedom of Information Day, both on March 16. Madison, of course, proposed the Bill of Rights and is known as the “Father of the Constitution.”

To mark the special occasion, published a series of stories examining government transparency issues:

Sunshine Week: Vermont on a long road to accountability in government

Sunshine Week: Poor transparency plagues local tax abatement programs

Sunshine Week: Lots of money, little transparency in Texas bond campaigns

Sunshine Week: First Amendment Foundation goes to bat for Florida’s right to know

Sunshine Week: Michigan House tries to fix ‘worst in nation’ FOIA law

The 1791 Sunshine Initiative

In honor of the ratification of the First Amendment and the great Americans who set the stage for government transparency, we are proud to announce the launch of our 1791 Sunshine Initiative.

Throughout Sunshine Week and beyond, we are asking our supporters and readers to commit to donating at least $17.91 per month online in support of the First Amendment and freedom of the press.

Whether it’s exposing secret government meetings, uncovering shady dealings, or revealing wasteful spending, our reporters spend each day letting in the sunshine. But they can only do it with your help.

We hope you’ll consider making a donation today to support our crucial work.

Here’s what our journalists have to say

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Meet Lou Varricchio, Vermont Watchdog Bureau Chief

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2017

Lou Varricchio

Lou Varricchio is a writer, editor, dinosaur enthusiast, NASA alumnus, and now, Vermont Watchdog’s new bureau chief. He brings over 20 years of journalism experience to Watchdog, and we’re excited to welcome him to the team.

Get to know Lou and why he loves journalism, paleontology, and astronomy in the interview below:

  1. Where are you from? Tell us about yourself.

I grew up in Pennsylvania and worked for the Quakertown Free Press (daily) and then became editor of the Emmaus Free Press (owned by the QFP back in the day).

Among my various career highlights was working as a NASA senior science writer at the Ames Research Center in California. I wrote stories for “NASA Insights” magazine about the team that did spacecraft and aircraft design testing using supercomputers, notably for the cancelled “Venture Star” X-33 space plane project that was supposed to replace the Space Shuttle.

I have undergrad degrees in communications from Temple University and Grahm College (now Mt. Ida College) and a M.S. in space studies from the University of North Dakota.

  1. How did you end up in Vermont?

I moved to Vermont in 1989 after I met my wife-to-be in 1988. She was a long-time resident of Vermont.

I worked as managing editor of the Vermont Eagle weekly newspaper from 2000 through 2016.

  1. What do you do when you aren’t being a journalist and editor?

In addition, having a master’s in science credential, I am able to teach college-level courses as an adjunct science instructor.

I teach both astronomy and dinosaur paleontology courses at the Community College of Vermont (CCV).

My love of dinosaurs emerged as a boy and then blossomed into being an amateur paleontologist. I have assisted my cousin, Dr. David Varricchio of Montana State University, on a Nat’l  Science Foundation dinosaur egg-nesting field project in the Montana badlands for several summers. I also enjoy observing the Moon through a telescope and star gazing–at least when the often cloudy skies of Vermont are clear enough to see through!

  1. Why did you choose a career in journalism?

I always liked writing and journalism, beginning in high school, and later science journalism; I started in community news reporting in Pennsylvania back in the ’70s. But I also worked on the other side, in public relations, at Champlain College in Burlington, Vt. for many years, trying to get the attention of editors and reporters.

  1. What is your favorite part of working in the news business?

The news business is both exciting and stressful with issues and deadlines being part of the package. It is especially wonderful to be close to the inner workings of our republic when reporting about local and state government. News reporting is an awesome responsibility. It is important that journalists not be part of the story or insert themselves in the reporting. The news business has changed a lot since the 1970s, most notably with the rise of online news sources.

  1. What does watchdog journalism mean to you? What sets Vermont Watchdog apart?

I came to greatly admire when the Vermont Eagle began publishing Vermont Watchdog reports in every issue starting in 2014. As the former editor, I watched how readers get more engaged; it is a terrific, investigative statewide feature to bring to a local weekly paper. That’s why I was honored (and humbled) to be asked to become part of Watchdog’s important mission. The Vermont Watchdog team is exceptional; we talk to each other and respect our strengths as well as our special beats. It should never be about egos or agendas, but finding and reporting the stories which support our news mission.

Watchdog Investigates: The problems with the Paxton prosecution

Wednesday, February 15th, 2017

Watchdog reporter Jon Cassidy isn’t afraid to go where no other journalist will go.

Watchdog reporter Jon Cassidy

Whether he’s exposing a far-reaching admissions scandal, uncovering wasteful spending by school districts, or shining a spotlight on union malfeasance, readers have come to expect hard-hitting reporting that challenges the prevailing narrative.

That’s certainly what they are getting with his reporting on the prosecution of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for securities fraud. Over the course of nearly two years, Cassidy has exposed inconvenient truths about the prosecutors’ flimsy case — which is costing taxpayers dearly.

In the latest chapter of the case, the prosecutors are now seeking to move the trial to a new county, claiming that Cassidy’s factual reporting — which they refer to 18 times throughout their court filing — is biasing potential jurors in favor of Paxton’s innocence.

Check out excerpts from Cassidy’s reporting below for more on the problematic Paxton prosecution.

An admission of innocence?

In Cassidy’s latest story, he dissects the prosecution’s claim that his reporting is biasing prospective jurors:

The court-appointed attorneys trying to imprison Attorney General Ken Paxton effectively admitted last week that he is innocent.

In filing a motion to move his trial to another county, Brian Wice, Kent Schaffer, and Nicole DeBorde blamed for ruining their chances to convict Paxton in Collin County.

It is a first principle of American criminal justice that the accused should be presumed innocent, that any fair and impartial trial begins with this presumption, and that it is the responsibility of the prosecution to overcome the presumption by assembling enough evidence to convince the jury of the guilt of the accused.

Wice, Shaffer and DeBorde do not have any evidence of Paxton’s guilt, so they have already started blaming the presumption of innocence. If jurors believe Paxton to be innocent, why then they must be “tainted,” according to these lawyers.

And what “tainted” prospective jurors? Cassidy’s exclusive reporting on the Texas Rangers’ investigation into Paxton might have something to do with it.

The Texas Ranger files

Watchdog exclusively reported on the Texas Rangers’ investigation into the charge against Paxton. The investigatory records showed that the criminal case against the Attorney General is based on an assumption. Here’s what Cassidy reported:

It’s an assumption that state Rep. Byron Cook (R–Corsicana) says he made about Paxton before investing $300,000 in a company called Servergy. Three of his friends say they made the same assumption, according to files obtained by

These four friends – Cook, Joel Hochberg, Bill Sandford, and Bob Griggs – have been investing together for decades. Cook and Sandford started going in on deals together 30 years ago; Hochberg joined them 20 years ago.

Those four had Cook’s attorney, Terry Jacobson, shop a complaint about Paxton to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Travis County District Attorney’s office, among others, before Paxton had even taken office as attorney general.

The first complaint, in early 2014, had been “submitted by someone who was associated with a political opponent of Paxton who was seeking office in the 2014 Republican primary election,” according to the Rangers’ reports.

Paxton’s opponent that year was Rep. Dan Branch (R-Highland Park), who was, like Cook, a member of the state House leadership team that Paxton had challenged two years prior in a failed run for speaker.

And then there’s this:

For more than a year, the complaints were tossed like a hot potato from one jurisdiction to another. The last toss was from Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis, an old friend of Paxton’s who couldn’t afford the perception that he was doing special favors.

Willis asked the Texas Rangers, a division of the Department of Public Safety, to investigate on April 14, 2015. In July, two well-paid special prosecutors and a judge who later recused himself got Paxton indicted on state criminal charges. The SEC jumped on the dogpile in April 2016 with a lawsuit against Paxton.

The Rangers’ first interview, on April 17, 2015, was with Jacobson, who said he was representing the four investors.

Although deception is a key element in any fraud case, none of the four claimed Paxton misled them – about getting Servergy stock, about putting his own money into the company, or anything else.

Rather, “Jacobson said the four investors assumed Paxton was also investing in Servergy based on past investments with Paxton,” Ranger Stacy McNeal wrote.

However, it was Cook who turned Hochberg, Sandford, and Griggs onto the Servergy opportunity, according to the records. It was Servergy CEO Bill Mapp who gave the presentation on the investment, not Paxton.

Sandford and Griggs, by their own admission, never even talked to Paxton about Servergy.

Their discussions about whether to invest were with Cook, who “was committed to investing in Servergy,” according to Sandford. Nobody claims that what Paxton was doing with his money even entered into the discussion.

Taxpayers on the hook

A politically-motivated prosecution is bad enough. Even worse? This is costing taxpayers a hefty sum.

The special prosecutors appointed for this case have billed the taxpayers in excess of half a million dollars, potentially in violation of state law. Here’s what Cassidy reported in January:

The court-appointed prosecutors in the Ken Paxton case have submitted new invoices that bring their compensation to date to $575,105.99.

The new batch of invoices from Kent Schaffer, Brian Wice and Nicole DeBorde covers the last year, with a total of $205,191.24 in new billing. Collin County taxpayers have already paid them $369,914.75.

The Collin County Commissioners Court had not yet received the invoices as of Thursday afternoon, but the latest tab is sure to set off a debate. In October, the commissioners voted 5-0 in support of a resolution to challenge excessive court-ordered payments for attorneys.

State law says that a court-appointed prosecutor “shall receive compensation” in the “same amount and manner” under a county fee schedule as a court-appointed lawyer defending a homeless person.

That’s not much in this case: $1,000 for pretrial work, $1,000 a day for trial, with a possible $1,000 bump if a judge deems it appropriate.

Yet visiting judge George Gallagher has ordered a $300-an-hour rate for the three attorneys prosecuting Paxton, without ever explaining what unusual circumstances might justify the extravagance.

Jon Cassidy has extensively reported on the Paxton prosecution, and he’ll continue to doggedly follow this story as it continues to develop. To access all of Jon’s stories on the subject, click here.

Meet Carter DeWitt, Franklin Center’s New Vice President of Development

Wednesday, February 1st, 2017

Carter DeWitt is no stranger to public policy organizations, bringing over 25 years of experience at the national, state and local levels with helping donors support the causes they are passionate about. She’s the Franklin Center’s new Vice President of Development, and she’s got big plans for 2017.

Get to know Carter and how she plans to grow the support for our public interest journalism in the interview below:

  1. Where are you from? Tell us about yourself.

I grew up on the beaches of northeast Florida (Ponte Vedra Beach) and lived in Florida most of my life – except for a recent five year stint in Washington, DC.  North Florida is a wonderful place to be, it has a younger demographic profile and tourism is a small sidebar, not a major industry. You get the best of both worlds, a thriving economy and great weather supporting year round recreation.  Not surprisingly, Forbes ranked Jacksonville, Florida as the number two place in the country for attracting new residents in 2016.

Washington, DC is a fantastic place to be as well, although I could not have chosen two more opposite places to live. I remember thinking when I first landed in DC, if someone had told me on the tennis courts a year ago I would be living a block from the White House and working in the National Press Building, I would have laughed and said “I’ll have two of whatever you’re drinking!” I loved DC, but sandy beaches were calling and I returned to Florida in 2013.

  1. How do you spend your leisure time? What are your interests?

Maybe this means I have no life, but I dedicate a lot of my spare time volunteering for a wide variety of other nonprofits from animal rescue to the homeless.  I guess I just love what I do – I don’t consider it a job and have no problem giving back in my spare time.

Now if you ask my adult children what I am interested in, besides tennis, they will tell you anything science especially dinosaurs and fossils. I have a budding fossil collection and a substantial shark tooth collection numbering in the thousands including a few megalodon teeth as large as your hand. I collect as I walk on the beach.  

  1. Why have you chosen a career in nonprofit fundraising? What excites you about development work?

I didn’t actively pursue a career in fundraising, actually I have a B.S in chemistry, which I never used.  However, my favorite reads are still medical journals and research papers. I am continually amazed at the ever increasing speed of scientific discovery. From new surgical techniques, to age reversal to anti-gravity devices and to AI (artificial intelligence), it’s a fabulous future barreling towards us all.

I fell into nonprofit fundraising because I seemed to have a natural knack of connecting donors with that special project, event or organization they felt passionate about.  I always felt blessed in life and always gave back to the community. I started early, raising $30,000 for a local zoo when I was in high school. As I matured I was called upon to chair events, oversee campaigns and it just grew from there. When my husband passed away, way too early, I delved into fundraising full time. I now have successful experience at the national, state, regional and local levels in almost every funding vehicle. Best of all I don’t feel like I am working. I wake up energized and looking forward to the day.

  1. What is your favorite part of working with donors?

Good question! I always say I work with my fellow development team members, but I work for our donors. It’s never about what I want – but always about what the donor wants. I enjoy helping individuals, foundations and businesses match their support – whether it be time, talent or treasure – to the projects and missions that resonate in their hearts and minds. I’ve met so many talented and fascinating people over the years and I feel blessed to have played a small part in assisting them as they give back to the community. It’s such a feel good career.

  1. What does watchdog journalism mean to you?

I was one of the angry masses during the 2016 presidential election cycle and my trust in mainstream media is pretty low – for good reason. Recently I read a quote from the New York Times complaining about President Trump, saying (paraphrasing here) that the public is inflamed over the treatment of a cherished and beloved American icon – the press. I broke out into laughter and all I could think was ‘what cup of coffee did that reporter buy in la-la land this morning?’

I’ve come to appreciate Watchdog journalism for its integrity, its investigative method and its nonpartisan reporting. I may not always agree with what is said, but I have to admit, we tell both sides of the story. I’ve had the privilege of meeting with and talking to a lot of the staff reporters and they are an impressive group. It means a lot to me when I talk to donors about our journalists and I can accurately use the highest of accolades. Few news outlets can do that with truth.

  1. What do you want donors to know about Franklin Center?

I left Washington, DC a few years ago thinking to myself “Been there, done that and got the t-shirt.” Despite several incredible job offers to return since I left, I had no intention of going back to the national scene, and I had no problem saying “no thank you.”  That changed when Nicki Neily, Franklin President and an old DC friend, reached out to me asking me to consider joining the team.  Out of respect for her I did my due diligence and analyzed the potential for Franklin Center and though to be honest, I started with every intention of repeating my “No, but thanks for thinking of me,” as soon as I finished my research.

What I discovered was amazing. I was blown away. I realized Franklin Center and stood on the precipice of opportunity and had all the tools to make their vision happen on a scale never anticipated since their founding in 2009. Experienced motivated leadership team? Check! Talented staff? Check! External opportunity created by self-implosion of a huge portion of mainstream media? Check! Untapped revenue sources? Check! My list just went on and on.  Call it a perfect storm or say that all the stars are aligned, but without a doubt, the next five years will be one heck of a ride and I wanted to be a part of the movement. I hope you’ll join me.

You can learn more about Carter by clicking here

A new administration begins, and Watchdog reporting continues

Wednesday, January 11th, 2017


No matter who leads our country, federal bureaucrats with political agendas will always run amok in Washington. And that means we are always under threat of overreach from the federal government. 

With a new administration taking office, here’s a look back at three major stories broke in 2016 about the federal government and how we will continue covering these issues in the new year.

1- The Google Administration

Watchdog reporter Johnny Kampis broke the news that Google officials visited the White House more than once a week on average since President Obama took office. The story immediately went viral, landing on the Drudge Report and the front page of Thousands of people were talking about the story on social media, including Rob Lowe, who tweeted his thoughts.

Kampis also broke a second story about the revolving door between Google and the Obama Administration, exposing that more than 250 people moved from Google and related firms to the federal government or vice versa since President Obama took office. For a second time the story was featured on the Drudge Report, and it also led to a segment on Fox Business.

Google was reportedly planning to remain close to the White House if Hillary Clinton has won, but with Donald Trump taking office, the tech giant is scrambling to get close to him and his staff. As Google and other major players try to gain access to the federal government and massage policy in their favor, we’ll expose their actions.

You can find all stories in our Google Administration series by clicking here.

2- Border Disorder Texas reporter Kenric Ward was built up trust with sources knowledgeable about immigration and border security, so they know they can come to him with big news. And they did: Watchdog was able to exclusively report that the Department of Homeland Security shut down a key aerial surveillance program along the border.

His reporting got the attention of a bipartisan coalition of public officials. Together, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and Sen. John Cornyn and Democrat Rep. Henry Cuellar demanded that the department resume the program. Abbott also shared Ward’s work on Twitter:

Will the new president resume the program, which was responsible for apprehending 110,000 illegal border crossers? As the Trump Administration moves to secure the border, we’ll continue to cover this important topic.3-

3- Deadly Delays

Wisconsin Watchdog bureau chief Matt Kittle exposed a huge scandal in the Social Security Administration’s Office of Disability Adjudication and Review: an employee who brought to light claims of incompetence, misconduct and long case delays told us that management was retaliating against him for blowing the whistle.

Meanwhile, Administrative Law Judge John Pleuss was accused of deciding disability cases based on the appearance and race of claimants and of making highly inappropriate and sexually-charged comments about them. Documents obtained first by Watchdog show the judge using terms such as “cute,” “buxom,” and “gorilla-like,” to describe claimants.

As a result of our reporting, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee began an investigation into the Social Security Administration. The judge was later suspended and escorted from his office, and more SSA employees at the center of scandals have decided to leave the agency or have been reassigned.

Will President Trump and the Congress clean up the SSA? We’ll be watching.

You can find all of our stories in the Deadly Delays series by clicking here. 

These stories are just a few examples of our impact journalism. And regardless of who holds office, government must be watched. That’s exactly what Watchdog does. While other news organizations get distracted with salacious stories and snappy soundbites, we keep the focus on what really matters.

As newspapers shed staff, we are helping to fill the void

Wednesday, December 7th, 2016

Even the nation’s largest newspapers aren’t immune to newsroom layoffs: earlier this year the Wall Street Journal announced it would cut 48 jobs as part of changes to its print edition.

Shutterstock Image

Journalism shouldn’t suffer just because newspapers are facing shrinking budgets.

But that’s a drop in the bucket compared to the losses taking place in the industry overall. In fact, newsroom jobs at daily newspapers across the country have declined by more than half from their high point in 1990, according to Ken Doctor, the president of Newsonomics.

And it’s only getting worse. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that newspaper reporter positions will decline by 28 percent and editor positions by 34 percent between 2014 and 2024.

This is bad news for newspapers, but it doesn’t have to be bad news for journalism.

Online and non-profit journalism are on the rise, as any follower of the Franklin Center knows. Our website is proving that digital investigative journalism has an important role to play in the future of media.

In fact, the Franklin Center is teaming up with traditional media outlets to help spread the truth about government mismanagement and overreach. Newspapers are valuable community institutions that millions of Americans still depend upon for their news, and that’s why we make all of our stories available for free to any news organization who wants to run our work. We know that every daily or weekly newspaper can’t afford to hire an investigative reporter or keep tabs on the state capital. But we can, and we hope to fill the void.

When columnists bemoan the decline of print journalism, the biggest concern is there won’t be enough journalists informing the public about important issues. This doesn’t need to be the case. By partnering with newspapers and broadcast outlets large and small, we are doing our part to ensure the public is informed about their government, whether they get their news in print or online.

You can support the Franklin Center’s public-interest journalism by making a tax-deductible donation. Click here to donate. 

Asking questions, getting results: Texas Watchdog’s investigation into traffic cameras

Monday, October 24th, 2016

When public officials learn that Watchdog is watching, they take notice.

Texas Watchdog reporter Mark Lisheron was hot on the trail of a secretive school zone camera program, and it all started with a phone call.

The caller gave us a tip about a lawsuit that wasn’t getting the attention it deserved; a citizen in Hays County (outside Austin) had sued the county government over speed cameras set up near schools, asserting that the Commissioner’s Court had no constitutional authority to enter into a contract with a private company that, in effect, created new traffic regulations – and meanwhile, most of the revenue generated was kept by the company.

Once Mark began asking questions, officials realized they could no longer hide. They had already gotten caught red-handed in the lawsuit, and we made their humiliation public. The day after our article was published, the county terminated its contract with American Traffic Solutions, Inc.

Click here to read “Hays County school-zone camera program could prove a costly mistake

But the issues with the cameras are far from resolved, as Bill Davis, the man suing over the program, explained to us in a follow-up article.

“The commissioners are taking the position to terminate a contract that is not a legitimate contract,” he said after the vote. “They didn’t address any of the issues in my suit. And what about all of the people like me who were issued citations?”

Davis is continuing his legal battle with the county, and Mark Lisheron and Texas Watchdog will continue to ask the tough questions.

Click here to read “Poof! Hays County school zone cameras gone”

Chances are, our work appears in one of your favorite news sources

Wednesday, September 14th, 2016

Every year, the Franklin Center reaches millions of readers through our news site But we also reach millions more through our media partnerships with national, state, and local news sources. Our hard-hitting investigative reporting and statehouse news coverage complement the work of other media outlets, injecting important stories into the news cycle.

Chances are, our work has appeared in one of your favorite news sources.

Here are a few of our most recent media appearances:

Wall Street Journal: Texas Janitors Mop the Floor With a Bullying Union

Texas Watchdog reporter Jon Cassidy teamed up with Charles Blain of Restore Justice USA to write this important story about a janitorial company’s civil court victory against the Service Employees International Union.

Professional Janitorial Services of Houston sued the SEIU and was awarded $5.3 million by a jury, the first time the union has been held responsible for defaming a business. Cassidy takes an in-depth look at what the union did to face the jury’s judgment.

Capital City Sunday: Matt Kittle Discusses his “Deadly Delays” Investigation

Wisconsin Watchdog reporter Matt Kittle appeared on WKOW’s “Capital City Sunday” to tell viewers about his groundbreaking investigation into the Social Security Administration’s problems with case backlogs and allegations of abuse, mismanagement, and harassment.

View the segment below:

You can get more info on Kittle’s investigation by visiting Watchdog’s “SSA’s Deadly Delays” page.

Washington Post: Abolish the Senate to Reign in Modern Presidents’s executive editor John Bicknell wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post about a unique idea to reign in the executive branch. In recent years, presidents have ignored Congress and taken unilateral action on a variety of issues. But to stop this from happening, the legislative branch needs to be emboldened, Bicknell writes:

Many proposals to address the imperial presidency have been floated over the decades. Some have even been implemented. None has stemmed the tide.

To rebalance the separation of powers, it is necessary to make Congress stronger. The best way to do that? Abolish the Senate.

Read the full piece to learn more about why the Senate is the appendix of American politics.

American Spectator: Alabama’s ‘Gig City’ Has One Gigabit Broadband Subscriber

Watchdog reporter Johnny Kampis found that if you built it, sometimes they don’t come. In a story first published in the American Spectator, he takes a closer look at an Alabama town’s municipal broadband program.

Despite a huge investment of $43 million in broadband infrastructure to deliver ridiculously fast internet, only one person has signed up for the 1 gigabit-per-second option.  Most customers are opting for traditional internet speeds, raising plenty of questions about why the town spent so much on faster internet that no one wants.

National Review Online: Louisiana’s Gutting of School-Choice Programs Deprives Its Poorest Children of a Good Education

Franklin Center’s Kevin Glass wrote this opinion piece at National Review Online, examining the effects of Louisiana’s cuts to school choice programs. Hundreds of children are being deprived of better education options after the governor disregarded his promise to not cut the budget of the Louisiana Scholarship Program.

Making matters worse, this was done just before the school year was about to start. Glass examines the situation in Louisiana, finding that school choice is in high demand by parents.

But that’s not all…

Throughout the year, our work has also been featured or cited in a variety of other outlets, including Townhall, Fox News, Complete Colorado, PJ Media, Politisippi, The Wheeler Report, Right Wisconsin, Bizpac Review, The Washington Times, RedState, Christian Science Monitor, Colorado Springs Gazette, Investigative Reporters and Editors, Daily Signal, Hot Air, California Political Review, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Washington Examiner, Forbes, Daily Caller, The Jackson Press, The Vermont Journal, The Vermont Eagle, C-SPAN, CBS Denver, Drudge Report, Newport Daily News, Real Clear Policy, Texas Observer, Cap Times, Huffington Post, Reason, US News and World Report, Wisconsin State Journal, Fresno Bee, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Idaho Statesman, Kansas City Star, Miami Herald, The State, The Telegraph, Eau Claire Herald, Vicki McKenna Show, Joe Pags Show, Howie Carr Show, Madison in the Morning, Oxford Eagle, Vermont Public Radio, The Capitolist, The Orange Leader, Houston NPR, Green Bay Press-Gazette, Northside Sun, Detroit News, Vermont Business Journal, and many more.


Watchdog follows the money as students head back to school

Tuesday, August 30th, 2016

Shutterstock Image

Shutterstock Image

It’s back to school season, so what better time than now to examine the intersection of money and education? As students across the country are starting classes, our reporters are hitting the books.

They certainly have plenty to investigate. Education accounts for nearly one-third of state budgets, with some states spending even more. Are taxpayers getting their money’s worth?

As the following examples from Watchdog reporters show, there is much more to education policy than what happens in the classroom.

Making bank at the FEA

Florida’s students and teachers have gone back to school. Union officials have gone to the bank.

Watchdog’s Will Patrick reports that the Florida Education Association, the state’s teachers union, pays 43 of its officials over $100K a year. The average teacher is making less than half of that with a salary of $48,000.

Looking at the numbers another way, almost half of all union dues paid by teachers go to pay FEA officials in salary and benefits. Much of the rest of the money goes towards supporting Democratic candidates and blocking school choice with lobbying and lawsuits.

Fortunately for Florida teachers, the state’s right-to-work law means they don’t have to join their union unless they want to. But these numbers might even have diehard union members rethinking their membership.

High pay for low grades 

Mississippi’s governor makes $122,000 a year. Thirty-six school superintendents in the state make even more.

That might be fine if their school districts were doing well. But as Watchdog’s Steve Wilson reports, among those 36 school leaders, nine of them — one in four — run districts that receive a D rating from the state.

That’s not the only area where spending and performance don’t match up. Of the 10 schools that spend the least per student, there were only two C or average districts, with the rest scoring an A or a B. On the flip side, the 10 highest-spending districts didn’t have an A grade among them, with one B, seven Cs and two Ds.

The good news for taxpayers? You have proof that you can spend less money to get better results, often because of charter schools: they’ve led the way in putting more money into classrooms and less into the pockets of bureaucrats, saving money and improving students’ lives along the way.

Shutterstock Image

Shutterstock Image

Bonding with taxpayers

Bonds aren’t free money, but schools in Texas seem to be acting like it.

Texas already has the second largest per-capita school bond debt in the country, and overpriced new buildings financed with large bond measures aren’t helping.

Watchdog’s Jon Cassidy has the full story of how these expensive bond measures will cost taxpayers and why a pro-bond coalition continues to lie to the public.

Plans are in place to build the most expensive junior high building in Texas history, but local officials and advocates don’t want people to know the full cost.

Fiscal irresponsibility hurts students 

In every state and school district, officials are making decisions based on dollar signs that will impact students’ futures. Our Watchdog reporters monitor education budgets at all levels, uncovering stories and spotlighting issues that need more attention.

James Wigderson exposed how a major school district in Wisconsin is raiding its maintenance fund to pay for expensive teacher health insurance plans.

Heather Kays brought readers the story of one family that is losing their school vouchers despite promises from the governor that the program would be spared from cutbacks. Emily Leayman

Emily Leayman examined how schools in Washington, DC are spending huge sums on non-teaching staff with questionable results.

For all of our education coverage throughout the school year, check out the Education Watchdog page on